🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “total contradiction” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the country’s government ministers demands plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a draft bill that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among civil society groups.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Recently, global health authorities issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“Evidence exists of industry lobbying everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” stated Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

In the letter, the company recommends this be lowered to thirty to fifty percent “according to global guideline limits”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a warning should cover at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, claiming that it would lead smokers to “black market” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for various offences “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

In the letter, the managing director of British American Tobacco Zambia says the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “specific rules can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We live in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative said: “The company operates its operations according with current country statutes. Additionally, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which provide for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The company was “not opposed to regulation”, they said, mentioning that young individuals should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to realize planned public health goals, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” they said, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which encompasses increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.